- Who is the accused? The victim(s)? Where did it take place? How long ago?
- What was the crime?
- How old was the defendant at the time? At the time of the trial?
- What were the charges?
- Was there any discussion in your articles about the background/history of the defendants? That is, were there extenuating circumstances (poverty, abuse, health, etc.) that may have influenced their criminal decisions?
- What did the parents of the accused have to say, if anything? The families of the victims?
- What was the outcome of the trial? The sentencing?
- Was there some sort of public comment, outcry, or protest associated with this case?
- Since the sentencing, have either the victims or the perpetrators been heard from, and if so, how?
2. Using the arguments presented in the articles in your reader, plus the ones I gave you (including the one from the Atlantic), examine the case that you chose...
- How might we take brain research into account in this case?
- Assume that at some point we outlaw trying juveniles as adults. How, then, would this case change?
- Assume that at the time of the crime, the accused juveniles were adults. How, then, would this case change?
- Do you believe, based on what you've read about this case, that the sentencing was fair? Why or why not? If you were judge (or emperor), how would you have dealt with this case?
3. My last big question: What does your case have to say about the juvenile justice system? What can, or should, we change?
My case says about the juvenile court system is that even if the defendant did not commit the crime he gets that set on his record for life. That is not fair because yes he was part of it but he was not the one who actually killed the victim. This system can also be fair enough though with the sentencing depending on the judge and his or her opinion. I think that we should change that the charges that he was faced with don't move to his adult record especially if they weren't the main person. I can understand if it was the one guilty and really did want to kill the victim but in this case it was an accident that he did not fully commit.